UPDATE: The Virtuous Woman … and the Intoxicated Man? Some Thoughts for Mother’s Day
See bottom of page for an encouraging update to this post.
·
KJV:
“Give strong drink unto him that is ready to perish, and wine unto those that
be of heavy hearts. Let him drink, and forget his poverty, and remember his
misery no more.”
·
NIV:
“Let beer be for those who are perishing, wine for those who are in anguish!
Let them drink and forget their poverty and remember their misery no more.”
·
NASB:
“Give intoxicating drink to one who is perishing, And wine to one whose life is
bitter. Let him drink and forget his poverty, And remember his trouble no
more.”
These are
two of the most intriguing verses in the entire Bible, yet I have never heard
anyone preach on them. If we go further down through Proverbs 31, we run into
the Virtuous Woman (vv. 10–31), and I’ve heard a lot
of preaching on that passage. Some pastors (not all!) have used the
example of the Virtuous Woman to set an unreachable standard for women and to
fill them with unnecessary feelings of inadequacy and guilt. What am I talking
about? Well, imagine we are in church on Mother’s Day 1997, and the pastor is
speaking.…
Happy
Mother’s Day! Let’s have all the mothers stand!1 Come on, now, if
you’re a mother, stand on up! Don’t be shy!
1 At
this point, the heart of every unmarried woman who wishes she were a married mother,
and the heart of every woman who is married but unable to bear children, and
the heart of every mother whose adult children are lost to her sink with a
deep, secret, inexpressible pain.
OK,
let’s give them a round of applause! Happy Mother’s Day to all of you here this
morning! What would we do without you? Thank you for making the immense effort
to get all the kids cleaned and dressed and here on time; thank you putting
today’s meal in the crockpot at 7 this morning; thank you for getting yourself
ready as well, showing up nicely dressed with nice hair and makeup; thank you
for being a constant support and encouragement to your husband, even though you
know all his faults! Later on, we’ll have some prizes to give to some of
you—the oldest mother here, the one with the most children, and so on.2
Happy, happy Mother’s Day to each and every one of you!
2 I remember a
service from my teenage years—back in the 1970s—in which this type of awards
program was tried. Pastor W: “OK, if you’re a mother over 70, please stand!
Wow, look at that! OK, if you’re over 80, please stand! Wow, they’re dropping
like flies, ha ha! Anybody over 90? Only Mrs. Green! Wow, that’s terrific! Mrs.
Green, exactly how old are you anyway?” Mrs. Green is dismayed—she doesn’t like
revealing her age, much less to the entire church. “I’m ninety-three,” she
admits and comes forward and receives her award. Then the pastor starts in
again: “OK, how about the youngest mother here today? We want to honor her
too!” Not having given even one single thought to this before he stood in the pulpit this
morning, he goes through the same routine until he finds the youngest mother
there: an unwed fourteen-year-old. When she goes forward to receive her
award, an awkward silence descends on the congregation. “We’re honoring
this?” someone mutters sotto voce.
Now,
let’s turn to … Proverbs 31!3 Yes, just as you’ve come to expect, because
it is Mother’s Day and we want to honor you, I’m going to beat you soundly
about the head and shoulders with … the Virtuous Woman!
3
At this point, the heart of every mother sinks, knowing she is in for it.
Ladies, are your loins girded with strength—that is, are you wearing a girdle (v. 17)? Do you keep a candle lit all night even though the cat could knock it over and burn your entire family to a crisp (v. 18)? Are you wearing a dress made from purple silk today (v. 22)? I can see from here that many of you are not! You’re not living up to the Virtuous Woman’s standards, you know! Maybe you should repent and work harder and beat yourself up more and thus become more virtuous! You do want to be virtuous, don’t you?
Do
your “hands hold the distaff” (v. 19)? They don’t?
What’s
that, Mrs. Hill? What does “distaff” mean? Well, it means…. Well, I’m not sure what
it means, but that’s not my business anyway—you’re supposed to be
holding it, not me!
But if
verses 10–31 are to be considered normative, what are we to do with verses 6–7
from the same chapter and spoken as “an oracle” by the same person, King
Lemuel’s mother? If we require mothers to “hold the distaff,” wouldn’t it
logically follow that if someone is depressed, we should get him a beer?
As I
mentioned above, I’ve never heard verses 6 and 7 preached on. So after thinking
the passage through many times over the years, and after a tiny bit of research
(I checked what Matthew Henry had to say, which was very little), here are my
conclusions.
The
Virtuous Woman (Prov. 31:10–31)
These
verses, originally spoken by a woman (v. 1), show an example of a strong,
respected woman who is also a wife and mother. Like much of the rest of the
Book of Proverbs, this passage is an example, not a goal
for every woman, nor is it a standard that God requires every believing
mother to achieve.4 But it does let us know that marriage, even in
the Old Testament, should not repress the wife. If she so chooses, she should
be involved and in charge of many things independently of her husband. Wives,
if you work outside of the home and have business ventures in which your
husband is not involved, God bless you (vv. 16, 18, 24)! Clearly, God approves
of that. And, husbands, if you stifle the gifts God has given your wife and
frustrate her God-given abilities … stop it. If you are doing that, you are in
the wrong, and you need to be humble and ask your wife’s forgiveness and allow
her to stretch her wings to do things she was gifted by God to do.
4
See, for example, Proverbs 3:9–10; 4:10; 5:22–23; 6:12–15; 9:8; 10:30; 11:8;
22:6; etc. None of these statements is intended as an infallible proof that is always
true in all circumstances. Proverbs speaks in generalities and
references the way things can go and many times do go in those
circumstances. Cf. 11:8: Are the righteous always delivered from
trouble? Not in this life. So the statement is typical, not normative.
The Virtuous Woman passage is not intended to beat women up, even though it has
often been used that way; it’s designed to encourage women to be fully
developed human beings—just as society expects men to be. It is really an
amazing and surprisingly liberated, modern passage regarding women and the
nature of marriage—written nearly 3000 years ago!
The Dying
Man (Prov. 31:6–7)
Now let’s
back up to verses 6 and 7. As stated above, the NIV reads, “Let beer be for
those who are perishing, wine for those who are in anguish! Let them drink and
forget their poverty and remember their misery no more.”5
Do what?
5
Some believers think the Bible completely prohibits imbibing alcohol. That’s
fine, but I have trouble fitting these verses (as well as 1 Tim. 5:23) into
that worldview. Although I am a lifelong teetotaler, the Bible teaches that Christians
are free to choose whether they drink alcohol or not, as long as they do what
they do to please the Lord.
Well, that’s what the passage clearly says. What are we to do with these words that fly directly in the face of other biblical teachings—even those here in Proverbs (23:29–35)?
First of
all, I must assume the words mean exactly what they say. In those days, getting
someone drunk to give him relief from his troubles was acceptable. I don’t know
how else you could take the verses.
“So, if
I’m down or have troubles weighing on me, I should get drunk and fall asleep on
the couch?”
I think
everyone would agree that that’s a terrible way to deal with your troubles. Like
the passage about the Virtuous Woman later in the chapter, this passage is typical,
not normative. We have other, better ways today of dealing with depression
and death.
Here’s how
I would write the verse for today: “If someone is dying a painful death, give
him morphine! If someone is depressed, give him Prozac! Both of these help
people in extreme circumstances avoid pain and suffering. And that’s a good
thing!”
I don’t
think it’s a stretch to conclude that God does not oppose the use of substances
to help those who struggle emotionally. I suspect that few Christians
successfully defeat clinical depression simply by reading their Bibles and
praying more. In fact, when you are truly clinically depressed (yes, I have
been there), if you can bring yourself to read your Bible at all, it’s as
though you’re looking at it through a pane of pebbled glass. And praying when
depressed? What is there to say? “Dear Lord, everything is awful and it’s going
to stay awful and then I’m going to die.” Trust me, those are the thoughts you
cannot escape when you are clinically depressed.
It seems
logical to believe that Proverbs 31:6–7 counsels depressed believers to start
on an appropriate medication and take it consistently and see whether your
outlook improves. Then reading your Bible and praying will start to be
effective again.
So, let us
hear the end of the matter.
1.
Women
(including, but not limited to, wives and mothers) are free to be strong and
independent and to be responsible for business ventures. In fact, they’re more
than just free to be that way, they are encouraged to be that way! But
they are not required to be that way.
2.
Christians
may use medications to feel better, both emotionally and physically. Period.
And that’s
all I have to say about it.
Copyright
2025, Steven Nyle Skaggs
PLEASE NOTE: If you disagree with any of my thoughts here, especially on vv. 6 –7, I would be eager to hear any alternative interpretations. In the interest of clarity and accuracy, here are the first 9 verses of Proverbs 31, to give us the complete context.
1 The sayings of King Lemuel—an inspired utterance his mother taught him.
2 Listen, my son! Listen, son of my womb!
Listen, my son, the answer to my prayers!
3 Do not spend your strength on women,
your vigor on those who ruin kings.
4 It is not for kings, Lemuel—
it is not for kings to drink wine,
not for rulers to crave beer,
5 lest they drink and forget what has been decreed,
and deprive all the oppressed of their rights.
6 Let beer be for those who are perishing,
wine for those who are in anguish!
7 Let them drink and forget their poverty
and remember their misery no more.
8 Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves,
for the rights of all who are destitute.
9 Speak up and judge fairly;
defend the rights of the poor and needy.
It was so uplifting and encouraging!
ReplyDeleteI sent this post to a pastor I have a lot of respect for to get his thoughts, especially about Prov. 31:6-7. I appreciate greatly his reply, although he disagrees with me about the verses. Because I asked people to respond if they had other ideas, I'm posting his response here (with his permission). I hope it is helpful to you!
ReplyDeleteFrom a Pastor--
I do not think these verses are commending giving alcohol to those who seem to be dying or who are bitter of soul. As you note in your post, that would be to contradict other Scripture passages, even in Proverbs itself. To take them this way would be to renounce other wisdom. Instead, the words of King Lemuel as taught by his mother indicate a contrast, probably with some derision. It's not for kings to drink alcohol. It doesn't solve the problem. By way of contrast, fools attempt to drink away their troubles. Here is what two of the better modern commentators say:
"The queen-mother does not recommend a free beer program for the poor or justify its use as an opiate for the masses; her point is simply that the king must avoid drunkenness in order to reign properly. The comparison to the suffering poor and to their use of alcohol is meant to awaken Lemuel to the duties that go with his class and status rather than to describe some kind of permissible drunkenness."
Garrett, Duane A. 1993. Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs. Vol. 14. The New American Commentary. Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.
"Kings have no reason to desire intoxicants (v. 4), but the perishing, who are bitter from lack of food, may have reason to want it. Nevertheless, the command to give intoxicants to all who are dying of hunger to anesthetize them permanently is sarcastic, not a proposed welfare program to provide “free beer … as an opiate to the masses.” The indefinite plural give (tenu) shows that the queen mother is not giving her son a specific command as in vv. 3, 4, 8. If taken literally, her command to give intoxicants (sekar, see 20:1) to the one who is perishing (leʾobed, see 10:28) and wine (weyayin, see 20:1) to those who are bitter (lemare napes, see n. 31) would be completely out of harmony with wisdom. The perishing and miserable in verse 6 are defined in verse 7 as suffering from grinding poverty. Drowning one’s sorrows in drink solves nothing; its anesthetic effects merely deepen the drinker’s inability to face his problems (see 20:1; 23:29ff.). Instead, the following proverb pair specifically commands the king to deliver the poor from their miserable poverty. To offer drink without that material help would be cynical. The sarcastic command aims to debunk intoxicants as useless. Their only possible value is to knock out the poor and to keep the addicts permanently in a drunken stupor. To make the point by negatives, the mother is not recommending intoxicants as either medicine, or a reminder to show love, or a stimulant, or to bring conviviality and cheerfulness to the dying."
Waltke, Bruce K. 2005. The Book of Proverbs, Chapters 15-31. The New International Commentary on the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
No commentary is inerrant, of course. And it is certainly true that the ancients did not have the medicinal options we are afforded today. But I would not want to make a case for modern medication based on these verses. I think that would have to be considered on other grounds because what Lemuel is saying does not seem to be a commendation.
I really enjoyed this post, Dad. Thank you!
ReplyDelete